Search for: "Santa Clara Valley Water District 4"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2021, 4:47 pm
Santa Clara Valley Water District v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 11:40 am
The Santa Clara Valley Water District board of directors endorsed a smaller, less costly one-tunnel project. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:35 pm
SamTrans is honoring Caltrain tickets in Burlingame and The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority is also honoring Caltrain tickets for anyone wishing to go north or south of the San Antonio Station. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm
City of Santa Rosa (Social Advocates For Youth, Real Party in Interest) (1st Dist. 2018) ___ Cal.App.5th ___, a dense 24-page opinion filed by the Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District (Division 4) on May 1, and later ordered certified for publication on May 24, 2018. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm
The plaintiffs and appellants wereSavePanocheValley, Santa Clara Audubon Society and the Sierra Club. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:13 pm
Expect traffic delays, consider alternate routes, and allow for addit https://t.co/lp5Ju9UdKv — San Francisco Department of Emergency Management (@SF_emergency) February 4, 2024 Mudslide closes Hwy. 9 in Santa Clara County A mudslide has closed both directions of Highway 9 at Sanborn Road in Santa Clara County, according to the California Highway Patrol. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
The Court of Appeal’s Opinion Water Supply Impacts As backdrop to the water supply impacts analysis, the Kern County subbasin of the San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin, which includes most of the project area, is a highly impacted basin that has been in critical overdraft condition since 1980, Under the recently enacted SGMA, a groundwater sustainability plan is required to be adopted for it by January 31, 2020. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:35 pm
Expect traffic delays, consider alternate routes, and allow for addit https://t.co/lp5Ju9UdKv — San Francisco Department of Emergency Management (@SF_emergency) February 4, 2024 Mudslide closes Hwy. 9 in Santa Clara County A mudslide has closed both directions of Highway 9 at Sanborn Road in Santa Clara County, according to the California Highway Patrol. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 7:22 pm
XIIID) and invalidated a special assessment imposed by the Santa Clara County Open Space Authority. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
Violations were also discovered at companies in Los Angeles, Sun Valley, Compton, Van Nuys and Santa Clara. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:05 pm
The Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District lies 45 miles along the Gila River, but the district receives water from the Colorado River at Imperial Dam. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 6:26 am
Pelham most recently served as director of ethics and corporate governance for the Santa Clara Valley Water District. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(a)(4), (6), 21096, and 21151.8.) [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
City of Santa Clara (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1150 which upheld the practice of negotiating a term sheet at the outset of project processing. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
City of Santa Clara, 194 Cal.App.4th 1150 (2011), because the approval was merely “a process for completing the Plan” and the MOU explicitly stated that “the County retain[ed] full discretion to consider the Final EIR and then to approve the Project, disapprove it, or require additional mitigation measures or alternatives. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. (2009) 170 Cal.App.4th 956, the court addressed the use of an exemption (Public Resources Code section 21080(b)(8)) for rate setting for groundwater extraction charges. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
” The case is Santa Clara Valley Water District v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. (2009) 170 Cal.App.4th 956: Generally, exemptions from CEQA must be justified and are narrowly construed. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
District Court in Roanoke. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
In its textured opinion, the appellate court relied heavily on facts in the trial court record to perforate all arguments raised by the Plaintiffs and Respondents Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Organization for Planning and the Environment, California Native Plant Society, and Wishtoyo Foundation/Ventura Coastkeeper.One novel issue raised in the case involved a challenge to a mitigation measure that recommended the herding… [read post]
